🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.